Briefs
Balancing the Needs of People and Wildlife: When Wildlife Damage Crops and Prey on Livestock
Balancing the Needs of People and Wildlife: When Wildlife Damage Crops and Prey on Livestock.
Beyond Boundaries Zoning as a Tool to Link Conservation & Development Goals - Draft
Beyond Boundaries Zoning as a Tool to Link Conservation & Development Goals - Draft .
Biodiversity Conservation and Carbon Sequestration Services of Silvopastoral Practices, Matiguás Río Blanco, Nicaragua
The Silvopastoral Project aimed to increase the use of silvopastoral techniques through technical assistance and payments for ecosystem services (PES) schemes.
Case Study Executive Summary: Reserve Project of the Juma Sustainable Development: Reduction of Emissions of Greenhouse Gases from Deforestation in Amazonas State, Brazil - PORTUGUESE
Case study presented by Fundação Amazonas Sustentável (FAS) at the Regional Workshop on Compensation and Payments for Ecosystem Services, August 9-13, 2010 in La Ceiba, Honduras.
Chico Mendes Law. Addressing social and environmental problems with payments for ecosystems services in Brazil
Chico Mendes Law.
Collaborative Land Use Planning: Zoning for Conservation and Development in Protected Areas
Collaborative Land Use Planning: Zoning for Conservation and Development in Protected Areas .
Community Based Joint Forest Management in Tanzania
The strength of this program is its focus on partnerships with local communities to protect the biodiversity of Tanzania’s Arusha, Kilimanjaro, Morogoro and Tanga districts.
Compensation in Brazil Redistributing federal taxes for stewardship of protected areas through the ICMS ecologico
Compensation in Brazil Redistributing federal taxes for stewardship of protected areas through the ICMS ecologico .
Conservation Concession Protecting Forest Ecosystems with payments for ecosystem service in Guyana
Conservation Concession Protecting Forest Ecosystems with payments for ecosystem service in Guyana .
Conservation Concessions in the Maya Biosphere Reserve Why payments for ecological services were not successful in Guatemala
Conservation Concessions in the Maya Biosphere Reserve Why payments for ecological services were not successful in Guatemala .
Credible Conservation: Using biodiversity monitoring to support incentive programs that protect endangered wildlife
Tenure Brief, No.
Deforestation vs. Poverty at Kibale National Park, Uganda: A Ten-Year Perspective
Deforestation vs.
Designing Pro-poor Rewards for Ecosystem Services: Lessons from the United States?
Designing Pro-poor Rewards for Ecosystem Services: Lessons from the United States? .
Ecological Complexity and the Management of Common Property Resources
Many community-based conservation programs are designed without carefully considering goals, community capacities, and the ecology of the common property resource.
Forest Restoration for Climate, Community, and Biodiversity in Tengchong County, China
Both the Forestry Farm and local farmers hold a view that the proposed CDM project activity will contribute to poverty alleviation and environmental benefice (biodiversity conservation and soil erosion control), and lead to sustainable development.
Forests and Forest Lands Management Training Guide
Forests and Forest Lands Management Training Guide (This is by EnterpriseWorks, but is from the USAID/Philippines' Eco-Governance Project, not TransLinks.
Fostering Ecosystem Services in the Danube Basin
The One Europe More Nature (OEMN) initiative was created in 2003 to promote integrated river basin management (IRBM) in order to restore floodplains and stimulate sustainable rural development in the region.
Gender and Shifting Water Governance: Differential Effects of Privatization, Commodification, and Democratization
Gender and Shifting Water Governance: Differential Effects of Privatization, Commodification, and Democratization .
Impacts of Payments for Ecosystem Services on Deforestation in Mexico: Preliminary Lessons for REDD
Tenure Brief, NO.
Incentive-Compatible Institutional Design: Who's in Charge Here?
Incentive-Compatible Institutional Design: Who's in Charge Here? .
