Opportunities for Transdisciplinary Science to Mitigate Biosecurity Risks from the Intersectionality of Illegal Wildlife Trade with Emerging Zoonotic Pathogens
Existing collaborations among public health practitioners, veterinarians, and ecologists do not sufficiently consider illegal wildlife trade in their surveillance, biosafety, and security (SB&S) efforts even though the risks to health and biodiversity from these threats are significant. We highlight multiple cases to illustrate the risks posed by existing gaps in understanding the intersectionality of the illegal wildlife trade and zoonotic disease transmission. We argue for more integrative science in support of decision-making using the One Health approach. Opportunities abound to apply transdisciplinary science to sustainable wildlife trade policy and programming, such as combining on-the-ground monitoring of health, environmental, and social conditions with an understanding of the operational and spatial dynamics of illicit wildlife trade.
https://biodiversitylinks.org/learning-evidence/one-health-evidence/one-health-evidence-inbox/aguirre-2021_transdisciplinary-science_mitigate-biosecurity-risks_iwt-zoonotic-pathogens.pdf/view
https://biodiversitylinks.org/learning-evidence/one-health-evidence/one-health-evidence-inbox/aguirre-2021_transdisciplinary-science_mitigate-biosecurity-risks_iwt-zoonotic-pathogens.pdf/@@download/image/image.png
File
Opportunities for Transdisciplinary Science to Mitigate Biosecurity Risks from the Intersectionality of Illegal Wildlife Trade with Emerging Zoonotic Pathogens
Author(s):
A. Alonso Aguirre
,
Meredith L. Gore
,
Matt Kammer-Kerwick
,
Kevin M. Curtin
,
Andries Heyns
,
Wolfgang Preiser
,
Louise I. Shelley
Publication Date: 2021
DOWNLOAD FILE
Existing collaborations among public health practitioners, veterinarians, and ecologists do not sufficiently consider illegal wildlife trade in their surveillance, biosafety, and security (SB&S) efforts even though the risks to health and biodiversity from these threats are significant. We highlight multiple cases to illustrate the risks posed by existing gaps in understanding the intersectionality of the illegal wildlife trade and zoonotic disease transmission. We argue for more integrative science in support of decision-making using the One Health approach. Opportunities abound to apply transdisciplinary science to sustainable wildlife trade policy and programming, such as combining on-the-ground monitoring of health, environmental, and social conditions with an understanding of the operational and spatial dynamics of illicit wildlife trade.
